divorce based on adultery by wife (Call # 9873540498)
Complaint 346390 Details

divorce based on adultery by wife (Call # 9873540498) adulteryincest.blogspot.in

divorce based on separation, divorce based on irretrievable breakdown of marriage, divorce based on annulment, divorce based on false age, divorce based on desertion, divorce based on psychological, ex-parte divorce grounds, domestic violence, bipolar spouse divorce, sexual harassment, abusive spouse divorce, foreign divorce, NRI Divorce, foreign country divorce validity in India, Cruel and inhuman treatment constitute as grounds for divorce, fault divorce, no fault divorce, disability divorce, alcoholism, violent divorce, alimony after divorce, maintenance issues in a divorce, memorandum, mou in divorce, mutual consent divorce

If any help needed then please contact:-

man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com

moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- [email protected]
web:- http://adulteryincest.blogspot.in

Listed below are the Grounds of divorce
Adultery
Cruelty
Desertion
Conversion
Unsoundness of mind
Schizophrenia
Virulent and incurable leprosy
Venereal disease in communicable form
Entering new religious order
Presumption of death
Non-compliance with a decree of judicial separation
Non-compliance with a decree of restitution of conjugal rights

No Fault

The most elementary grounds for divorce is basically of the no fault variety. It is commonly assumed that no fault divorce is a late 20th century discovery, but this is not the case. Long before, Jewish law allowed for no fault divorce. If there were irreconcilable differences, if the couple was simply incompatible, and they decided, after all their efforts, that they could not make a life together, then divorce could be finalized.

It was not necessary to prove adultery, or any other serious charge of marital malpractice, in order for husband and wife to terminate their union. Thus, even though divorce is not a happy event, in situations of mutual agreement it can be relatively straight-forward.

Fault

Divorce becomes more complicated when only one of the partners wants the divorce, or demands the divorce from the other. This type of litigational complexity arises from charges by one or the other of the partners that the spouse has been derelict in marital responsibilities.

There is a precise halakhic (Judeo-legal) inventory of the circumstances when either the husband or the wife has the right to a divorce, a right which thereby obligates the other partner to cooperate. The majority of problems arise when the husband refuses to cooperate, and to a lesser degree when the wife, who now cannot be divorced against her will, refuses to cooperate. Rabbinical courts do have some muscle, but lack the real force of the Bet Din (Rabbinical Court) of yesteryear. Rabbinical Courts can impose sanctions, and in situations of husband or wife intransigence, it would be most helpful for the court to use all of its muscle to make sure that the couple cooperates.

Denial of Basics

The husband may demand the divorce if his wife denies him the benefits of conjugal visitation, what is termed in the Torah as onah. This is a fundamental ingredient of the marital union which, if deliberately distorted, destroys the marriage at its very root. Additionally, the wife's desertion without any just cause is also grounds for the husband demanding a divorce. In such instances, when it is clear that the wife is at fault, she also forfeits the ketubah (marital contract) settlement.

The ketubah settlement is the amount promised by the husband to the wife at marriage, should the marriage break up either through divorce, or the death of the husband. However, when it is the wife who precipitates the break, she is not allowed to gain materially from her causing the marriage's disintegration.

These instances of non-cooperation by the wife, either through denial of onah or desertion, give the husband the right to divorce his wife. However, it does not confer upon the husband the responsibility to divorce his wife. It is a right which he may choose not to exercise.

Adultery

The situation of adultery is different. When there are actual eyewitnesses who testify to the wife's adultery, the husband has no choice but to divorce his wife. He may no longer live with his wife, in the face of her own brazen con-tempt for the sanctity of the marriage, and her failure to protect the integrity of the marriage institution. And it can be nothing but brazen contempt if the adultery took place in the presence of two eyewitnesses.

It should be understood that although adultery is a grievous breach, the type of adultery that would necessitate divorce is a rare type, that which is carried out, after forewarning, in the presence of witnesses. That type of arrogant, contemptuous adultery hardly occurs.

When it does occur, such irresponsible behavior eats away at the very fabric of Jewish life and cannot be tolerated within the marriage. Since it is the community at large that suffers from this type of behavior, neither the husband nor the wife can place themselves above the community by ignoring or sanctioning such behavior. The community is bigger than any individual or any couple.

Spoiling the Meal

Mention should be made of another possible just cause for the husband seeking a divorce. This is the situation of the wife spoiling her husband's food. Obviously, the rate of divorce would be astronomically high, and married life would be a continual pressure cooker, if every spoiled supper or burned breakfast toast could be used by the husband as an excuse for divorce.

The language of the Talmud in this situation seems to focus on the element of spite. The language of this clause is, precisely, that "she spoiled his food" (Gittin, 90a). This means that her own food was not spoiled, but that his was spoiled. This would indicate that the wife deliberately spoiled her husband's food but made sure that her own meal was okay. Such culinary spite speaks of the wife's purposeful setting out to ruin her husband's meal, and indicates that the marriage has reached intolerable levels.

Again here, as in most of the other instances of the husband's right to divorce, the wife can counter-attack with legitimate reasons for why she spoiled her husband's food, such as that he used offensive and foul language to her, or abused her, and she was so mad that she took it out on the vegetables or the meat. One can assume that the Rabbinical Court would have nothing but admiration for her restraint, rather than imposing the husband's unwarranted desire for divorce upon her.

If any help needed then please contact:-

man cell delhi is available 24 hours at our permanent email id aturchatur(at)yahoo(dot)com

moblie :- +91-9873540498
email:- [email protected]
web:- http://adulteryincest.blogspot.in